Academic integrity your institution can defend ✓ verifiable
iOriginally brings similarity detection, transparent AI-writing analysis, and independently verifiable certificates into one platform — trusted by examiners, faculty, and administrators to produce answers that stand up to scrutiny.
Works with the systems your institution already runs
From submission to defensible answer
Submit, any way you work
Students submit through your LMS, offices bulk-upload ZIPs of theses, systems integrate over the API — nine file formats, virus-scanned on arrival.
Analyse in three layers
Similarity against internet, publications, and your repository — plus AI-writing signals and byte-level integrity flags, each reported separately.
Decide with evidence
An interactive report with live filters, an annotated PDF on the original layout, and a certificate anyone can verify by QR — audit-logged end to end.
One report. Every answer your committee needs.
Highlighted matches with named sources, side-by-side comparison, and live exclusion filters — designed for the moment a result is challenged.
Carbon pricing and industrial decarbonisation pathways
Carbon pricing has emerged as the central policy instrument for aligning private incentives with climate objectives1, yet its diffusion across industrial sectors remains uneven. This chapter examines the conditions under which emissions trading produces measurable abatement in heavy industry, drawing on panel data from 42 jurisdictions.
Existing literature emphasises price stability as a precondition for investment. Firms exposed to volatile allowance prices systematically defer capital expenditure on abatement technology2, a pattern first documented in European markets.
Recent analyses suggest that the interaction between carbon pricing and complementary policy is more consequential than either instrument in isolation.AI
The methodology follows a difference-in-differences design with staggered treatment adoption3, addressing heterogeneity concerns raised in rесеnt есоnоmеtrіс work.
Side-by-side evidence
Click any highlight to see submission and source aligned — exact matches and paraphrases as distinct layers.
Live exclusion filters
Quotes, bibliography, small matches, and assignment templates — the score updates in under two seconds.
Annotated on the original
Downloadable reports highlight matches directly on the uploaded document — layout, pagination, and fonts preserved.
Three layers of scrutiny, reported separately
Similarity, AI-writing signals, and document-integrity flags are analysed and presented as distinct layers — so reviewers always know exactly what kind of evidence they are looking at.
Similarity detection
Matching against internet sources, scholarly publications, and your institution's own repository — with paraphrase detection and cohort-level collusion analysis built in.
AI-writing analysis
Segment-level probabilities, highlighted in place and kept strictly separate from the similarity score. Every AI screen carries your institution's policy note — a signal, never a verdict.
Integrity flags
Hidden white text, look-alike Unicode characters, zero-width spacing, and image-only pages — detected at the byte level during ingestion and surfaced with location evidence.
Certificates anyone can verify in seconds
Every completed analysis can issue a formal, institution-branded originality certificate with a QR code that resolves to a public verification page. Employers, examiners, and partner universities can confirm authenticity instantly — no login, no document exposure.
- Forgery ends at the scan. A tampered PDF fails the public check the moment anyone verifies it.
- Mapped to your policy framework. Configure similarity bands to your national standard or your own thresholds.
- A receipt for every submission. Verification code, SHA-256 fingerprint, timestamp — recorded and emailed automatically.
Built for thesis season
Research offices and examination teams check submissions in bulk, not one at a time. Quick Submit takes a ZIP of two hundred theses — no course setup required — and returns a working table of scores, policy levels, flags, and one-click certificates.
- Per-file metadata — candidate, supervisor, department, and degree flow straight onto each certificate.
- CSV export for the record — results land in the format your office already files.
- Versioned resubmissions — a revised thesis produces a new report you can diff against the last.
One platform for every desk
Integrity officers, instructors, students, and administrators each get a purpose-built workflow — not a shared screen with different permissions.
Bulk checking without course setup
Quick Submit handles individual theses or ZIP batches of hundreds, with metadata that flows to certificates automatically.
Results as a working table
Scores, policy levels, flags, and certificate actions in one sortable view — exportable to CSV.
Defensible months later
Every download, decision, and certificate is audit-logged, so challenged cases are settled with records, not recollections.
An inbox that reads at a glance
Similarity and AI chips, integrity flags, lateness, and grades in sortable columns, with bulk actions for downloads and resubmission requests.
Feedback where the text is
Inline comments, reusable QuickMarks, weighted rubrics, and voice notes — grading lives next to the evidence and releases on your schedule.
Template text excluded automatically
Upload the assignment brief once — boilerplate is fingerprinted and excluded from every score in the class.
Watch the check happen
Drag, drop, and follow a live pipeline — scan, extract, match, report — instead of staring at a spinner.
Proof of submission, always
A digital receipt with verification code and file fingerprint, emailed instantly — disputes about lost uploads end here.
Learn from the report
Where the instructor allows it, students see their own report — citation gaps become a lesson before they become a case.
The whole institution, one dashboard
Usage, similarity trends, policy-level distributions, and most-active departments — exportable for accreditation and annual review.
Your policy, brand, and data
Institution-wide defaults, your logo on every report and certificate, retention windows you control, and bulk user import with dry-run validation.
Procurement-friendly billing
Annual licenses or prepaid credit packs, quoted per institution — purchase orders and bank transfer are first-class payment paths worldwide.
Student work is unpublished IP. We treat it that way.
Custody, isolation, and deletion are engineered to be provable — not promised. Run iOriginally in the cloud, or entirely on infrastructure your institution controls.
Database-enforced isolation
Row-level security on every tenant table — institution boundaries are enforced in the database itself and covered by automated cross-tenant tests.
Never used for training
Student documents are never used to train models and never shared across institutions unless you explicitly opt into the shared repository.
Retention you control
Per-institution retention windows with automated purge, legal-hold flags, and full export or deletion on request — GDPR- and DPDP-ready.
Hardened by default
Antivirus scanning on every upload, signed expiring file URLs, SHA-256 fingerprints, modern password hashing, and 2FA for administrative roles.
Everything is audited
Logins, admin actions, report downloads, certificate issuance — a filterable audit trail your compliance office can query years later.
Self-hosted option
The full platform — detection engines included — deploys on servers you control, making data residency a configuration choice, not a negotiation.
An honest comparison — including where we don't lead
We sell with the truth. Row by row against the incumbents, including the one place the market leader is still ahead.
| Capability | iOriginally | Turnitin | DrillBit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live filter recompute — no re-analysis | ~ | ||
| Anti-masking flags — hidden text, homoglyphs, image-only pages | ~ | ||
| Public certificate verification — QR, no login | ~ | ||
| Report annotated on the original document layout | ~ | ~ | |
| Fully self-hosted deployment option | |||
| Licensed closed-publisher full-text corpus | ~ |
Trusted where the decisions are hard
An external examiner questioned a certificate. We scanned the QR code, the verification page confirmed it in seconds, and the matter was closed before the meeting began.
Dr. Elena MarshDirector of Research Integrity · public research university
We moved two hundred theses through Quick Submit in an afternoon. Filters recompute instantly, so review meetings stopped being arguments about bibliographies.
Prof. Marcus ElleryDean of Graduate Studies · comprehensive university
The AI report shows its segments and says "signal, not proof" right on the page. That one sentence keeps our academic panels calm and our decisions defensible.
Amara OseiHead of Academic Standards · international university
Frequently asked questions
Can we run iOriginally entirely on our own infrastructure?
Are student documents used to train models or shared with other institutions?
How reliable is the AI-writing detection?
Does it work with our LMS and student information system?
Can similarity thresholds match our national regulations?
How long does implementation take?
Can we switch from Turnitin or DrillBit mid-contract?
What support and training is included?
How does purchasing work for a public institution?
See iOriginally on your own documents
A 25-minute walkthrough with your integrity team — real submissions, real reports, real certificates. No slide decks, no commitment.
Book your demo
Our team replies within one business day.
Request received
Thank you — our team will reach out within one business day to schedule your walkthrough.